A topic that avoids using that symbol which is fifth and most common in our standard form of communication.

I ask that you avoid using a kind of symbol whilst posting in this topic. This kind of symbol was told of in that topic atop this paragraph.

Fun fun!

Woohoo!

Our taboo glyph post chain is back!

I should probably add that, though I might stand on my own in this, I'm highly discouraging posts using substantially awkward grammar.

I find it sad that nobody would post in our random discussion.

Our comparably infant "Word Association" post chain fulfills its basic duty now.

I would add that, ironically, our Word Disassociation chain is not dissimilar to our random prompt in its motivation.

Is this chain of posts also random in its motivation? Or did I just disturb your flow?

This post chain contains 118 instantiations of our taboo glyph.

This, though, is not our fault.

118? My browsing application is malfunctioning, or this statistic is obviously wrong. Ctrl+F shows only 89 instantiations of our taboo glyph in this chain. How could said quantity diminish?

Admins can do things to post chains that normals cannot. Buttons for such actions contain our taboo glyph.

Ah. I forgot you act as an admin. So now I can find out what said buttons do and hack NP and <maniacal laugh>...

Gasp, such a plan! T'is good to sing or talk; or pound out glyphs in a happy fashion, not to hack!

Bans follow hacks.

Also, counts of just our taboo glyph will not hint at much. Many admin buttons lack it.

Ah, but you must know that hacks also follow bans!
I disclaim: anything I post in this chain is with high probability untruth.

A disclaiming word may start assuaging discomforts, but my mind says allay your own: put trust in this forum's capacity to know humanity's motivating thoughts. (It is not my wish to sound frightfully odd, but alas I think I do!)

How happily a girl or boy may play on NP! Such fun it is to not touch that fifth glyph for writing.

Um, I'm a good...work...guy

abcdfghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

Your list of glyphs is an amazing paradox which I cannot fathom: our standard array of glyphs contains six, multiply by quantity four and a third, glyphs, though your list has quantity two, multiply by quantity two plus half, multiply by that again - that is, standard amount of glyphs minus that first of naturals.

qwrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm!!!

I am not construing that notion you try to put into words.

Fail.

Sorry. Changing.

Intriguing posts. It is random.

this is a funny topic. LOL.