Yes thank you! I couldn't remember the term. That being said there is no evidence of a dog ever being anything but a dog. There is no fossil evidence of a transitional animal. There is that bird/dinosaur fossil...but I don't find it very convincing! I bet you know the name of what I am talking about ;) So yes, I am fine with microevolution. But for me time doesn't solve the problem of macroevoltion. There is NO evidence!
I am aware other Christians believe in evolution. I will soon read up on it. I don't think I'll be changing my mind though.
Not yet, but relative to other species, dogs are relatively new, so they're all still one species. But we have evidence of dogs evolving from wolves, so we know they did evolve. I'd recommend checking out these videos:
He does a really good job of explaining evolution and how it works.
I'd like to end my post with this: Scientists have no attachment to the theory of evolution. If someone were to present evidence against it, scientists would have no trouble changing their mind. Science is about finding out more about our universe and how it works. Ignoring evidence doesn't do that. Ignoring evidence does, however, make it possible to continue believing in something that is demonstrably false.